MetaMask has issued an announcement on platform X, making it clear that any mission associated to the buying and selling or pre-market buying and selling of the MetaMask token ($MASK) shouldn’t be affiliated with Consensys.
No MetaMask Airdrop or Token Exists
MetaMask has firmly said that it has not launched any official token. On its verified X account, the corporate emphasised that there isn’t a such factor as a MASK token and warned customers about fraudulent claims suggesting in any other case. Regardless of these clarifications, deceptive ads and promotions proceed to flow into, selling speculative platforms that don’t have any official ties to Consensys.
Please remember that initiatives indicating buying and selling, or pre-market buying and selling, of a MetaMask token are unaffiliated with Consensys.
There isn’t a MetaMask token.
These ads and promotions are for speculative platforms unrelated to Consensys and with out our involvement or…
— MetaMask.eth 🦊 (@MetaMask) March 3, 2025
These unauthorized promotions have raised considerations throughout the crypto neighborhood, as they try and lure customers into participating with illegitimate platforms. MetaMask has strongly suggested customers to confirm info from official sources and conduct thorough analysis earlier than interacting with any mission claiming to be related to the MetaMask model.
Group Reacts Strongly to False Data
Regardless of the official denial, the false info rapidly gained traction on social media. Some well-known X accounts, together with Smokey, the Group Lead of Polygon, shared pleasure over the unverified claims, unintentionally contributing to the unfold of misinformation. This led to widespread hypothesis that MetaMask was getting ready to launch its personal token and conduct a serious airdrop.
Because the rumors unfold, many customers started posting about their anticipation, fueling additional hype and deceptive extra individuals into believing {that a} MetaMask token launch was imminent. Nevertheless, this declare had no strong basis. In actual fact, spencecoin.eth, a workforce member at Consensys and MetaMask, had explicitly said of their X bio: “There’s no MetaMask airdrop,” making it clear that MetaMask had no plans to concern a token.
Supply: X
A DEX Promoted the Pretend $MASK Token
Additional complicating the scenario, decentralized change LogX confronted backlash for itemizing the unverified MASK token on its pre-market buying and selling platform. On the night of March 3, LogX unexpectedly introduced that customers may start buying and selling the MASK token, claiming that it was the official token of the MetaMask pockets.


Supply: X
This sudden announcement triggered a frenzy available in the market. Inside minutes, the MASK token surged to $4.13, pushing its absolutely diluted valuation (FDV) to an astonishing $4.13 billion—an unimaginable quantity for a token that had by no means been formally confirmed.
The itemizing by LogX has raised critical considerations in regards to the accountability of decentralized exchanges in the case of itemizing belongings that haven’t been verified. Many neighborhood members have criticized LogX for not conducting correct due diligence earlier than permitting the token to be traded, as such actions can mislead traders and encourage hypothesis primarily based on false info.
Defending Customers from Crypto Scams
This incident highlights the rising dangers within the crypto area, the place pretend token launches and deceptive info can rapidly unfold, creating confusion and potential monetary losses for traders. It additionally serves as a reminder that customers ought to all the time confirm info from official sources moderately than counting on social media hype.
MetaMask’s assertion serves as a powerful warning to the neighborhood: There isn’t a official MASK token, and any claims suggesting in any other case are fraudulent. Customers ought to stay cautious, keep knowledgeable, and keep away from participating with platforms selling speculative buying and selling of unverified tokens.
Readmore: Recap of the $1.4 billion theft from Bybit by hackers