An X submit by Anita Posch warning in regards to the dangers of governments and establishments shopping for up giant quantities of bitcoin went viral this week— even when simply due to the trollish neighborhood word that appeared beneath it. I feel the primary concern right here is that these large holders may affect the Bitcoin consensus guidelines to impose censorship.
On the subject of censorship particularly, mining centralization is definitely a extra direct menace. But when it’s simply miners censoring, it will solely final for so long as a majority of miners is prepared to maintain doing it— on the expense of forfeiting transaction charges. If and when the censorship stops, transactions would begin confirming once more as if nothing occurred.
If financial nodes have been to implement censorship as new protocol guidelines as properly, nevertheless, it could actually certainly be thought of a tender fork. On this state of affairs, miners can’t revert from the censorship with out splitting the blockchain between “upgraded” (censoring) and non-upgraded nodes; that might represent a tough fork. Patrons and sellers of the 2 variations of bitcoin would then decide which blockchain is extra helpful; because of this some bitcoiners are involved about governments and different giant establishments accumulating a big share of the bitcoin provide.
It’s an inexpensive concern, and one thing to pay attention to. On the similar time (and much like my argument on this Take), it’s not apparent to me that governments or giant establishments can be prepared to danger all of it by betting on a censorship fork of Bitcoin. However much more importantly, there isn’t a lot we will do to cease governments or different establishments from shopping for bitcoin anyhow— nor ought to there be, as that might (mockingly) itself symbolize a type of censorship.
One of the best countermeasure, on this regard, was really already proposed by Nikolaus: Don’t promote MicroStrategy your bitcoin.
This text is a Take. Opinions expressed are totally the creator’s and don’t essentially mirror these of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Journal.
