China’s Supreme Individuals’s Procuratorate has revealed a set of suggestions that will reshape how the nation investigates and prosecutes cryptocurrency-related cash laundering, together with a proposal to deal with the usage of mixers and privateness cash as proof of prison intent.
The article, launched within the official Procuratorial Day by day, was written by two prosecutors from Hunan Province’s Yuhu District and an affiliate regulation professor at Xiangtan College.
The authors argue that the decentralized, pseudonymous, and cross-border design of digital currencies has outpaced China’s authorized framework and created a three-part downside: defining the offense, gathering proof, and recovering stolen property.
On the heart of the talk is a spot between statutes. China’s Anti-Cash Laundering Legislation has dropped restrictions on which predicate offenses qualify, however Article 191 of the Felony Legislation nonetheless limits cash laundering fees to seven classes.
In consequence, most crypto circumstances fall below Article 312, which covers concealing prison proceeds, a cost the authors describe as a catch-all. They name for wider use of the cash laundering statute and a “one case, two checks” precept that will require investigators to search for laundering indicators in each main prison probe.
Burden shifts in China’s courts
Three proposals stand out. The primary, described as blockchain self-authentication, would deal with on-chain information from public block explorers as dependable when hash values match, and would preliminarily set up their integrity.
The second would shift the burden of proof: as soon as prosecutors submit a transaction-chain evaluation report, the protection would wish to disprove it.
The third would permit courts to presume laundering intent from conduct alone. Below that commonplace, the usage of mixers or privateness cash, the sale of enormous holdings at off-market costs, or high-value transactions by means of nameless wallets with no clear supply would set up intent until a defendant provided an inexpensive rebuttal.
The authors additionally deal with proof assortment, noting that mixers, privateness cash, and decentralized exchanges permit multi-layered splitting and cross-chain transfers that conventional strategies battle to hint.
They suggest adaptive guidelines for digital information, tiered requirements of proof, and clearer authorization for technical measures similar to real-time monitoring and site visitors evaluation, with limits to guard private data and cybersecurity.
Asset restoration presents an extra impediment. With crypto buying and selling banned in China, authorities maintain seized cash with no authorized channel to liquidate them.
The paper recommends a nationwide platform to retailer, worth, and get rid of confiscated property by means of compliant channels, together with an knowledgeable committee that will set values utilizing on-chain information and worldwide trade costs.
It additionally urges bilateral and multilateral agreements and a blockchain-based “judicial cooperation chain” to hint and freeze funds moved overseas.
The suggestions carry no authorized drive, however they sign a doable route for China’s courts. The proposals arrive as Chinese language-language laundering networks processed $16.15 billion in 2025, about 20% of the worldwide complete, in response to Chainalysis.
In 2024, Chinese language prosecutors introduced fees towards greater than 3,000 individuals in crypto-related laundering circumstances, a determine that underscores the size of the problem.
