The Bitcoin Coverage Institute (BPI) has launched a brand new coverage proposal for america aimed toward establishing what it calls “stablecoin supremacy.” The proposal, revealed on Wednesday, is structured round 5 coverage areas and comes on the heels of the already-enacted GENIUS Act.
Bitcoin Coverage Institute Warning
On the heart of BPI’s argument is the declare that regulated stablecoins may help prolong US oversight over offshore greenback markets. Within the institute’s view, doing so wouldn’t solely scale back systemic dangers but additionally blunt what it frames as China’s push into digital forex.
The BPI describes how offshore banks can create dollar-denominated credit score on their very own, seize the income from intermediation, and depend on the Federal Reserve (Fed) as a sort of implicit backstop when the system strains.
BPI characterizes this setup as a critical vulnerability for the US financial system. Due to that, the institute argues that regulated stablecoins supply america a device for restructuring the underlying dynamic.
Associated Studying
Underneath the GENIUS Act, signed into regulation in July 2025, BPI says stablecoin issuers should preserve 100% reserves in devices corresponding to Treasury payments, Treasury repo, or insured deposits. The regulation additionally prohibits issuers from lending towards these reserves.
BPI says the result’s that when a international particular person or company holds a GENIUS-compliant stablecoin as a substitute of putting funds in a Eurodollar deposit, the related Treasury safety sits on the steadiness sheet of a US-regulated entity relatively than feeding the offshore system’s capacity to multiply credit score.
In BPI’s framing, the greenback worth can transfer all over the world, however the reserve stays “residence,” decreasing what it calls the exterior vulnerability dimension of the Triffin Dilemma.
Stablecoin Supremacy Blueprint
BPI additional hyperlinks the stablecoin case to broader aggressive pressures in digital property. It notes that China’s digital yuan now pays curiosity to holders and that China’s Cross-Border Interbank Cost System processes transactions throughout 190 international locations.
The institute additionally factors to Europe’s MiCA regime, arguing it supplies a framework for euro-denominated stablecoins that’s, in some respects, extra superior than present US implementation.
Taken collectively, BPI says these developments weaken American affect over the “rails” the place cash really strikes—an space BPI calls each probably the most contested and most fragile a part of greenback dominance.
To reply, the institute proposes a framework to advance stablecoin supremacy throughout 5 coverage areas. First, it requires hardening GENIUS Act implementation by constructing a backstop structure.
BPI describes this as creating dedicated repo traces with main sellers and establishing a path to Federal Reserve Standing Repo Facility entry, with the purpose of constructing compliant stablecoins extra enticing than offshore options.
Second, BPI proposes that america export stablecoins relatively than Eurodollar deposits in worldwide commerce settlement. The intention, in keeping with the institute, can be to drag Treasury demand again onshore and remove what it describes because the offshore credit score multiplier on marginal greenback flows.
Associated Studying
Third, BPI argues for a price and rewards method that permits regulated stablecoins to compete with interest-bearing Eurodollar deposits and even China’s digital yuan—whereas nonetheless staying throughout the GENIUS Act’s statutory curiosity prohibition.
Fourth, the proposal addresses decentralized finance (DeFi) dangers. BPI warns about DeFi credit score multiplication and requires smart-contract-level restrictions and enforcement “chokepoints” to make sure unregulated protocols can not replicate the Eurodollar multiplier on blockchain networks.
Lastly, BPI says the US ought to protect international forex sovereignty by supporting native financial techniques alongside stablecoin adoption. The institute frames this as a manner to make sure stablecoin integration acts as shared financial improvement relatively than monetary coercion.
Within the institute’s view, these targets may be achieved with out issuing extra sovereign debt to international governments or increasing the Federal Reserve’s steadiness sheet.
Featured picture from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com
