The UK tv personalities Ant McPartlin and Declan Donnelly—recognized collectively as Ant and Dec—have gained a court docket order to hint transaction particulars of artworks they personal, after an middleman took “secret and unauthorised income” from the gross sales, they declare.
A UK Excessive Court docket choose dominated on 4 March that there’s an “controversial case” for the court docket order, which was filed by McPartlin and Donnelly in August 2025. It centres on a relationship between the duo and an unidentified artwork marketing consultant, solely referred to within the submitting as ‘X’. The nameless social gathering dealt with the pair’s buy of six Banksy prints for a mixed £550,000 from the artwork seller, Andrew Lilley [of Lilley Fine Art ltd]. Nonetheless Lilley allegedly acquired solely £300,000 for the works.
McPartlin and Donnelly are looking for clarification over this £250,000 discrepancy and have expressed concern that “secret and unauthorised income” might have been taken inside the chain of transaction. Lilley will now be compelled to disclose to disclose particulars of his buying and selling with the unnamed middleman. The court docket heard that earlier requests for these particulars had been refused, on the idea of confidentiality. The declare doesn’t accuse Lilley or his firm of wrongdoing.
The court docket heard that the marketing consultant had been appointed on an agreed 10% fee and that the working relationship resulted in September 2021.
The duo additionally declare they acquired £11,000 for his or her sale of one among Banksy’s Napalm prints, through the middleman, which they now imagine bought for £13,000. Data concerning 22 gross sales are being sought.
Lilley instructed the BBC that the dispute is finally “a matter for the courts now and between A&D [Ant and Dec] and the third social gathering [X]”.
Choose Iain Pester ordered the knowledge to be handed over on 4 March, following a listening to the day earlier than. Representatives for all events had not responded to The Artwork Newspaper’s request for remark by the point of publication.
McPartlin and Donnelly’s case focuses on acquiring data through the Norwich Pharmacal Orders [NPOs], a court-order which requires a respondent to reveal paperwork or data to the applicant.
In a 2020 case (Hickox v Dickinson), an NPO was granted, requiring the artwork seller Simon Dickinson, who had acted as agent within the sale of a Paul Signac portray, to reveal the identification of the purchaser and different details about the transaction.
“Norwich Pharmacal Orders are used as a regular software for acquiring disclosure that we ceaselessly deploy or take into account in related circumstances,” says Amanda Grey, a accomplice at Mishcon de Reya. “The curiosity right here is little doubt as a result of events concerned. The court docket will take sure elements under consideration prematurely of granting an NPO, as has been reported right here.”
